Joined
·
69 Posts
Sorry guys, don't mean to bug you down by approaching the subject of "costs", for me is just a curiosity really...
I've bought my Spyder in the beginning of the year for a price below market value... so I was obviously expecting the car to need some work etc. eventually by now I've reached what was back then an avg market value for the car, not too bad I would say 'cause now at least I know certain things have been done to the car in a certain way...
Now my question is... what is the actual cost for these cars (purchase price + running costs)? example: I bought my car for 31K USD and so far spent enough to bring the total to 42K, which is slightly above it's market value here (including taxes, insurance etc etc). Would this ratio be any better with a newer car or the total cost just gets higher and higher as the car gets older? talking in terms of bang for the buck here... eventually this will tell us when it's best to buy and how long to keep a car like this...
I've bought my Spyder in the beginning of the year for a price below market value... so I was obviously expecting the car to need some work etc. eventually by now I've reached what was back then an avg market value for the car, not too bad I would say 'cause now at least I know certain things have been done to the car in a certain way...
Now my question is... what is the actual cost for these cars (purchase price + running costs)? example: I bought my car for 31K USD and so far spent enough to bring the total to 42K, which is slightly above it's market value here (including taxes, insurance etc etc). Would this ratio be any better with a newer car or the total cost just gets higher and higher as the car gets older? talking in terms of bang for the buck here... eventually this will tell us when it's best to buy and how long to keep a car like this...