Joined
·
528 Posts
Not really... You could argue that there's more Fiat/Ferrari DNA in these cars than Maserati and that there hasn't been a "real" Maserati built since the brothers sold their interest in OSCA in the 60s.
Maserati's really had a checkered past as a business entity. there's not reallly a continuous thread as there is with Ferrari or Alfa. The Maserati reputation really goes back to the late 40's early 50's race cars. and Sports cars like the A6G. Do you really want to point to the Chrysler TC by Maserati or the De Tomaso era cars as awesome examples? How about the Citroen SM?
After the problems with the BiTurbo cars, the brand was dead in the US and the Ferrari connection is what allowed Maserati to return to the North American market. Without the backing of Ferrari's reputation for performance and exclusivity it's doubtful the 4200 or QP would be available on the US market.
I think the modern "Maseratis" are great cars but think it has more to do with design by Pininfarina and Giugiaro and engineering by Ferrari than with their being built by "Maserati".
YMMV
Maserati's really had a checkered past as a business entity. there's not reallly a continuous thread as there is with Ferrari or Alfa. The Maserati reputation really goes back to the late 40's early 50's race cars. and Sports cars like the A6G. Do you really want to point to the Chrysler TC by Maserati or the De Tomaso era cars as awesome examples? How about the Citroen SM?
After the problems with the BiTurbo cars, the brand was dead in the US and the Ferrari connection is what allowed Maserati to return to the North American market. Without the backing of Ferrari's reputation for performance and exclusivity it's doubtful the 4200 or QP would be available on the US market.
I think the modern "Maseratis" are great cars but think it has more to do with design by Pininfarina and Giugiaro and engineering by Ferrari than with their being built by "Maserati".
YMMV